Can TSMC Really Save Intel?

Advertisements

The question of whether Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) could acquire Intel's semiconductor fabrication plants has piqued the interest of industry insiders and analysts alikeRecent reports have surfaced suggesting a potential partnership between TSMC and Intel, speculating that they might establish a joint venture to oversee Intel's American manufacturing operationsReuters highlighted on February 15 that the current U.S. government may not be supportive of foreign entities managing domestic Intel facilities, adding a layer of complexity to the discourse.

In light of these developments, financial stalwarts Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase released analyses on February 16, asserting that the likelihood of TSMC either acquiring or running Intel's fabs is quite slimAccording to JPMorgan, TSMC would have to secure substantial concessions and agreements from multiple stakeholders, including government entities, shareholders, and customers, to even consider embarking on such a venture.

Furthermore, TSMC's upper management has consistently emphasized their strategic focus, indicating that due to the significant variations in factory layout, cost structures, and corporate cultures, the acquisition or operation of external foundries is not on their priority listAs such, JPMorgan views the chances of TSMC taking over Intel's facilities as exceedingly low unless potentially bolstered by strong governmental financial incentives and clear commitments regarding TSMC’s role in such an operation.

The discussions around TSMC potentially sharing its N3 and N2 process technologies with Intel have also emerged, as certain media outlets speculated about TSMC dispatching engineers to assist IntelHowever, JPMorgan considers this notion overly optimistic, believing it improbable that TSMC would willingly relinquish its state-of-the-art technology, given the high value it places on intellectual property protectionTSMC is likely to resist any requests of this nature vociferously.

Moreover, it's notable that Intel's foundry business is projected to face staggering losses of approximately $7 billion in 2024. Should TSMC opt to take control of Intel's factories or create a joint venture, this might impose considerable short-term negative repercussions on its profit margins

Advertisements

Consequently, the market's initial response could lean toward pessimismIn this scenario, TSMC's management resources would also be tasked with a considerably heavier burden, given the disparity of operational modes between its facilities and those of Intel.

On the valuation front, even though such a move could initially cause downward pressure on TSMC's earnings per share, it might substantially elevate TSMC’s status in the marketplace, fortifying its position as the sole company with large-scale advanced process capabilities worldwideAnalysts at JPMorgan predict that over the next three to five years, Intel may emerge as a more significant customer for TSMC, particularly as Intel’s priority shifts towards regaining market share and revenue, rather than independently enhancing its foundry capabilities.

Conversely, Morgan Stanley has pointedly indicated that TSMC has previously denied any intentions of acquiring Intel's factoriesThe insight provided by Morgan Stanley underscores TSMC’s positioning in the semiconductor foundry market, attributing its success to extensive research and development investments that have granted it a competitive edge, especially in advanced foundry processes.

The bank emphasized that TSMC’s strategy regarding its U.S. operations is dictated primarily by customer demands and shareholder value rather than an altruistic aim to assist its American competitor, IntelInterestingly, the only significant management meeting TSMC held recently occurred on February 12 in the U.SHowever, the company refrained from commenting on tariff issues or geopolitical considerations during that gathering.

Previous earnings calls have seen Morgan Stanley probing TSMC management about potential interests in joint ventures within the U.S., akin to those established in Japan and EuropeIn a Q2 2024 call, for example, TSMC management reassured stakeholders that while the company remains committed to expanding its U.S. foundry operations, the establishment of joint ventures would not be considered

Advertisements

The clarifications suggest that TSMC is steadfast in its existing operational strategies, prioritizing advanced processes and their innate technological advantages.

During the Q3 2024 earnings call, Morgan Stanley once again inquired about a hypothetical acquisition of Intel’s U.S. fabs, to which TSMC curtly replied it had no vested interest in Intel’s plantsThey reaffirmed that Intel, functioning as an integrated device manufacturer (IDM), has historically been an influential client, and the expectation is for continued business in the future.

Additionally, TSMC has reiterated its capability to achieve growth within the CPU foundry market by partnering with companies like AMD and specializing in Arm architecture-based CPUsThe firm has also expressed that aligning the processes of other foundries to meet TSMC's standards is cost-prohibitive and would present significant challenges regarding human resource integrationThus, Morgan Stanley assesses TSMC as unlikely to pursue a strategy of acquiring external fabs.

The conversation around TSMC's potential engagement with Intel and the broader semiconductor landscape reveals the complexities and competitive realities of the industryAs technological innovation accelerates, companies must navigate not only the technical aspects of semiconductor manufacturing but also the geopolitical and economic implications of their strategiesWhether TSMC will ultimately alter its trajectory regarding Intel remains an open question, but the current landscape suggests that strategic independence and a careful approach may be the prevailing strategy going forward.

Advertisements